Paste text below
Text entered
NO to AV – the non-partisan, cross-party campaign against the Alternative Vote – calculate that AV will cost the country up to £250 million
Today NO to AV have released the first calculation of the total cost of the Alternative Vote on British taxpayers’ with the following key findings (click here to read the full report):
•The total cost of the referendum will be up to £250 million. The spending breaks down as: the referendum itself costs £82 million with the cost of voter education ahead of the referendum at £9 million. Should AV pass, the cost of electronic vote counting necessitated by AV will be £130 million and the cost of voter education with AV will be £26 million.
•And this is a conservative estimate because there will likely be additional costs – more polling stations because AV ballots take longer to complete, additional election staff training, and customized machine-readable ballot papers.
•This is an entirely unacceptable expense on an issue few people care about at a time of economic crisis – we’re all paying for Clegg’s ‘miserable little compromise’.
•£250 million could instead pay for 2,053 doctors, 5,719 police officers, 6,297 teachers, 8,107 nurses, 36,000 hip replacements or 60,000 school places.
Commenting, Matthew Elliott, Campaign Director of NO to AV said:
“The British people will be staggered to learn that our politicians are considering squandering £250 million of taxpayers’ money on a new voting system at a time when they are being told to tighten their belts. Who really thinks the national priority should be the introduction of the alternative vote rather than more nurses, more teachers and more police officers. The simple fact is our country can’t afford AV.”
Text entered is not saved. Save now
Save above text so that it can be shared and viewed side-by-side with news articles
- Don't be fobbed off by ...
- Drugs arrests in west end
- Waitrose to invest in growth ...
- Mini Rhubarb Crumbles
- Study: Group yoga improves motor ...
- Thomas Cook- trading update
- Weight has strongest influence ...
- High bodily levels of nickel and ...
- Police issue Spine road warning
- Study finds alarming 15-fold ...
- Hotter Shoes
- Myleene Klass and Jon Culshaw ...
- Highways Agency to start work on ...
- HEROtsc still on the growth trail
- The first gourmet coffee to come ...
- Sainsbury's named UK's best ...
- Waitrose to open first ever ...
- Sainsbury's and Jamie Oliver ...
- UK businesses “woefully ...
- BBC Two’s biggest new drama ...
- Waitrose - Home cooks help save ...
- St Andrews to launch scholarship ...
- Go Compare
- GoCompare (via 72Point) - Brits ...
- Waitrose - A dessert designed ...
- OnePoll (Yeah but)
- STRONG ORDER BOOKS BOOST OUTPUT ...
- Car clamp nightmare
- Press Association - iPad2 tablet ...
- Explicit sex ed materials pushed ...
| 5 news articles similar to text entered | Visualisation | Side-by-side | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| , |
cut |
pasted |
characters |
|||
Loading news articles
Text entered
No to AV calculate that AV will cost the country up to £250 million
www.no2av.org
28th February 2011
NO to AV – the non-partisan, cross-party campaign against the Alternative Vote – calculate that AV will cost the country up to £250 million
Today NO to AV have released the first calculation of the total cost of the Alternative Vote on British taxpayers’ with the following key findings (click here to read the full report):
•The total cost of the referendum will be up to £250 million. The spending breaks down as: the referendum itself costs £82 million with the cost of voter education ahead of the referendum at £9 million. Should AV pass, the cost of electronic vote counting necessitated by AV will be £130 million and the cost of voter education with AV will be £26 million.
•And this is a conservative estimate because there will likely be additional costs – more polling stations because AV ballots take longer to complete, additional election staff training, and customized machine-readable ballot papers.
•This is an entirely unacceptable expense on an issue few people care about at a time of economic crisis – we’re all paying for Clegg’s ‘miserable little compromise’.
•£250 million could instead pay for 2,053 doctors, 5,719 police officers, 6,297 teachers, 8,107 nurses, 36,000 hip replacements or 60,000 school places.
Commenting, Matthew Elliott, Campaign Director of NO to AV said:
“The British people will be staggered to learn that our politicians are considering squandering £250 million of taxpayers’ money on a new voting system at a time when they are being told to tighten their belts. Who really thinks the national priority should be the introduction of the alternative vote rather than more nurses, more teachers and more police officers. The simple fact is our country can’t afford AV.”
Churn statistics
cut
pasted
characters overlap